Inquiring Minds Want To Know
I read in
the paper today that a duck’s quack doesn’t echo. Can anyone tell me if this is true.
I read in
the paper today that a duck’s quack doesn’t echo. Can anyone tell me if this is true.
MRambler Central powered by
WordPress. LetoPrime theme. Wordpress Themes.
Entries (RSS)
and Comments (RSS).
November 1st, 2006 at 3:49 pm
I saw this on a MythBusters episode. The final answer is well, yes it does echo. Here are the details from the Wikipedia entry on that episode:
November 1st, 2006 at 4:08 pm
I’m lost in time here. The “following” echo is swallowed by the “original” quack??????? Is this simultaneously done at the same deferent times?
I also learned that actually ducks can’t fly. They are great jumpers.
And you are at work answering duck questions but too busy to answer the phone?
November 1st, 2006 at 10:44 pm
Hahahahahahahahaha!
November 2nd, 2006 at 9:04 am
Anon, you’re right, Ducks don’t fly – without an airplane, they’re greedy and think rabbits are despicable….. I watch “Daffy Duck”, too!…..
November 4th, 2006 at 1:11 pm
This site has a better explanation: “A Duck’s Quack Doesn’t Echo, and no-one knows the reason why?” from the Salford Acoustics Audio and Video department of the University of Salford. Here’s a good bit from the site that tries to answer why the myth arose in the first place:
November 4th, 2006 at 3:14 pm
No, No, NO!…… Daffy told me it was because of his lisp…… The echo is absorbed by the flying saliva….. Sow….thwere!…..
November 5th, 2006 at 12:36 am
Yeah, What He Said!
November 8th, 2006 at 1:04 pm
Apparently the quack of a lame duck does not echo.